October 06, 2003
THERE WAS NO JOY

Dear Ottawa, Canada:

Yesterday I had what I thought would be the privilege of seeing the Best of Ottawa International Animation Festival presentation at the Calgary Film Festival.

Eleven animated shorts, representing the award-winners of the OIAF, which is the LARGEST Animation Festival in NORTH AMERICA, and the second largest in the WORLD. How wonderful! How educational and entertaining!

How about DISMAL, DISAPPOINTING, ASSAULTING and OFFENSIVE?

My wife is an illustrator and I am an actor and voice-over artist; we love animation and do our best to support the industry and increase the awareness of it in a broader sense than mere mainstream theatrical releases allow.

Never again.

We were so utterly chagrined at the wasted effort put into this so-called "award-winning" offering that we have decided to never again spend 86 minutes of our lives at any kind of festival of animation.

Firstly and most importantly, let me target with extreme prejudice Canada's own National Film Board. The two offerings-- "Flux" and "Twang"-- were not only visually amateur and derivative of early Bill Plympton (without the humour) but were much more offensive because we knew that some Canadian Arts Council agency had actually given a GRANT of taxpayer's money for this piece of tripe that a student could produce on their first foray into a six-week introductory animation course.

Why was that last example so specific? Because my wife actually TOOK a six-week introductory animation course and THAT was the caliber of "final projects" that the class turned out.

The International aspect was well-represented with German, Mexican, British, and Polish animated fare; but did you not consider the fact that every one of the offerings was depressing, dealing with death and war and child abuse? I wouldn't say it wasn't art, but string all these things together and you have an audience that is continually and repeatedly assaulted right down to a spiritual level with depression and angst.

Which brings me to another point: This is North America. We tend to view "animation" as synonymous with "for children." Oh sure, we as artists know that animation deserves a broader appeal, a wider respect-- but for the love of God, could you not have factored in that perception when you decided which films to show, and either RATED or in some way WARNED parents with young offspring that some of these films are not targeted at children?

My wife and I were offended by the continual (!) dark angst of the Festival and felt even more sorry for the families who attended, whose children had no idea why they were being subjected to these sad, angry shorts when they were expecting cartoons. Or at least, some HAPPINESS every five minutes or so.

But you did throw in one cartoon, a "Samurai Jack" episode. Congratulations for appeasing the mainstream. Of course, you picked one of the longest, most drawn-out, boring episodes of Samurai Jack, not to mention one where he is left alone and bereft at the episode's conclusion. Children who could at least identify with something they'd seen on TV were, doubtless, left with a distinct impression that they'd been swindled.

Even the relatively innocent "Leunig" shorts began with some whimsy but ended with a trumped-up piece about faith and belief which ended on a much-less-than-happy note.

I also blame the Quickdraw Animation Society in Calgary. Like any special-interest group, they seemed to completely forget that a festival audience deserves to have the material prefaced or introduced in some way; a problem endemic to artists who do not know how to showcase their own work, or even talk about the genre.

I am sick to death of the "Festival mindset" that believes that just because something isn't MAINSTREAM, that it must therefore be ART-- which in turn means it deserves high praise because it isn't something that everyone can understand.

My greatest wish is that the entire Canada Council of Arts be sacked, and replaced with actual, real working artists-- and then a healthy sprinkling of commercial businesspeople, the ones whose job it is to sell art and make something of it (got to keep those artists grounded in the real world, after all) and so therefore take the decisions on what is award-worthy out of the hands of idle upperclass matrons with too much time and money and not enough sense.

I am a Canadian, I have long been a fan of animation in all its forms, and I am here to tell you that I am offended.

Posted by Agent M at October 06, 2003 09:59 AM
Comments

Very well said!!!

Posted by: Your Mom on October 6, 2003 10:53 AM

On the other end of the scale is Spike and Mike's Classic Festival of Animation, which I saw a couple of years ago in Vancouver (Sadly, that edition never made it to Cowtown). What did we see? 18 shorts that included one or two of those slit your wrists European pieces that Agent M mentions.

We also saw "Rejected", "Father and Daughter" (which won the academy award that year) and "For the Birds" (from Pixar). About half the entries were really really good - either tremendously funny (such as "Rejected"), or pushing the limits of talent and creativity (such as "The Prince and the Princess", which used intricately detailed silhouette cut-outs to tell the story).

Not that Spike and Mike don't have their own problems (such as recycling half their shorts from the year before into this years presentation), but it seems obvious that the boys do have high standards.

It's not like there's a shortage of good stories and animation out there - I think you just got a particularly rotten apple this time.

Plus, I've noticed that serious (read, pretentious) film geeks tend to consider animation a poor cousin. I still remember when they were anouncing the nominees for Best Picture during the 64th Academy Awards. Everything got cheers except for "Beauty and the Beast", which got silence - because it wasn't a real movie.

What does this mean? I don't know, but my wild ass guess is that animation is not considered for inclusion in a film festival unless it is 1) depressing, 2) foreign, 3) blessed by the nation's arts council. Or in this case, all of the above.

Don't write it all off, just ignore the stuff at CIFF.

Posted by: Quixote on October 6, 2003 11:08 AM

Well, actually I'd write off Spike and Mike for many of the same reasons.

Most of their stuff can be found on the Internet, now; there's no reason to go to the theatre to see it. And, as you point out, there's a great deal of re-hashing of old stuff going on.

These are the guys that gave Mike Judge his start with Beavis and Butt-Head, and Nick Park with Wallace and Gromit. Oh, for the days when it all MEANT something.

Now, however-- let's just say it will be a great long while before I indulge in any festival-oriented animation fare.

M

Posted by: Agent M on October 6, 2003 11:37 AM

Bravo Agent M! Great rant.

I totally agree with Quixote with this summation:

>animation is not considered for inclusion in a
>film festival unless it is 1) depressing, 2)
>foreign, 3) blessed by the nation's arts council.

Ridiculous. And sad.

Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go check my finances, so I can purchase the unedited, fully restored, 4-disk super-wahoo set of Loonie Toons cartoons coming out this month in all their anvil-dropping glory. They just don't make 'em like that anymore. :D


ACK!

Posted by: Agent CK on October 6, 2003 12:30 PM

Almost forgot...

>Everything got cheers except for "Beauty and the
>Beast", which got silence - because it wasn't a
>real movie.

Yup... I remember that. How utterly annoying.

Of course, now the Academy, in all its "wisdom", has created the "Best Animated Film" category, so that they don't have to have animated stuff in with "Best Picture" anymore. Great suffing Jeezuz on a pogo-stick...these people just don't get it, do they?

(Mind you, I stopped believing in the Academy Awards long ago... now I just watch 'em for the glitz and fun... and give the "People's Choice" awards a little more attention...)

ACK!

Posted by: Agent CK on October 6, 2003 12:37 PM

Take your time to take a look at some information in the field of poker system, casino no download, online casino fun, gambling online, blackjack statistics, roulette casino on net, gamble best, internet casino software, slot machine play, online casino bonus casino on net, online gamble bet, casino gambling 8888, casino game bet, las vegas money, video poker 3d, roulette online stake, slot net, blackjack online system, blackjack betting wagering, poker sites, gambling tips, blackjack table, poker best, casino virtual, casino no download, gambling virtual. .

Posted by: slot on January 29, 2004 10:19 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?